The Moral Maze of ‘I demand my rights!’

I appeared on The Moral Maze on BBC Radio 4 last night talking about human rights. It was fun. Afterwards the four of us who had been the ‘witnesses’ interrogated by the regular panel were leaving and waiting for a lift. I joked that I had better get back to my children or they might complain that I was neglecting their rights to parental attention.

Shami Chakrabarti replied, “Oh I get that all the time!” She went on to say that her child (children?) demanded a right to privacy. I guess this is when she wants to go into their rooms and tell them to tidy up. There must be all sorts of interesting debates in the Chakrabarti household.

This reminded me of a point that Melanie Phillips had been making near the end of the programme about how the concept of human rights can divide people and how it is better to have a concept of duty. Shami Chakrabarti had said that human rights involve duty, too – presumably because if I have a right, you have a duty to respect it. That is logical but misses the reality. The truth is that the concept of ‘rights’ is primarily used by people to demand things from those in authority like schools, governments, hospitals and so on. For the individual, human rights are often about demanding what you want, not doing good.

This is not my major objection to human rights but it is an interesting sidelight.  My main objections are here and, to a lesser extent, here.

Here is a link to the Moral Maze programme. I am not sure for how long it will continue to be available for listening.

  1. Human rights do not exist
  2. The Human Rights Act increases the level of crime
  3. John Humphrys – the biased voice of the BBC
  4. What role has the Children’s Act in classroom disruption?
  5. What is going on at St Thomas’s Hospital (2)?
This entry was posted in Media, including BBC bias, Off the subject and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Moral Maze of ‘I demand my rights!’

  1. Jill Garrow says:

    I agree with Michael Buerk – you were a very entertaining ‘witness’. And I also agree – wholeheartedly – with the points you were making. [BTW - Was Clifford Longley really that baffled by your comments or was he trying - and failing (in my opinion) - to make a 'clever' point?]

    I feel this ‘Human Rights Act’ is not only a criminals’ charter but part of the creeping Marxism that is silently invading our country – and is to our country’s detriment.

  2. Duncan Bush says:

    I enjoyed the programme – and your calm defence of your ideas against the somewhat badgering style of those opposing them was highly effective. I was intrigued by your assertion of the primacy of legal rights over human rights. . . But I find I need to think about this more. . .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>