Long after it appeared, here are a few links to coverage of the interview which David Freud gave earlier this year in which he suggested that most people on incapacity benefit should not be there.
Here is a link to the original interview.
Here is the BBC coverage of the story.
Here is the Times coverage.
I would like to add a link to coverage of the story by the Guardian but unfortunately I cannot find any. The BBC and the Times thought it was a big enough story to cover. David Freud is, after all, a government adviser and he was saying something pretty radical (though of course it was in The Welfare State We're In). Did the
Guardianreally avoid covering it because the view was unpalatable to itself and perhaps some of its readers? Or was it because it was a Telegraph exclusive?
Here is a part of the interview:
In the dying days of the last regime, the Freud Report - which called for large sections of the welfare state to be privatised - became a political football between Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. The then prime minister wanted it as his legacy, the then chancellor did not want it as an inheritance and did all he could to emasculate its proposals.On one occasion it is said that Mr Freud had to sit through a 45-minute shouting match with Mr Brown, before being aggressively cross-examined by a room full of Treasury advisers.
"It was a robust process," the banker admits. "There was a negotiation. Normally the negotiation takes place over two years; they had a week and a fairly obdurate writer who's used to being beaten to a pulp in the City. It was like a deal and I thought I've got to get through this as unscathed as possible."
This week, however, Mr Freud was hired by James Purnell, the new Work and Pensions Secretary, as an adviser and asked to help implement nothing less than a revolution in the welfare state.
There has, he believes, been a sea change in Labour's thinking about the benefits system. "Gordon Brown has now said they're going to do it," he says. "Peter Hain [the previous work and pensions secretary] was worried about the Left. Purnell is showing astonishing energy, there is going to be a much more single-minded ferocity."
Mr Freud's big idea is that the private sector be put in charge of the long-term unemployed. Companies taking part would receive a huge fee for getting somebody to stay in a job for more than three years but nothing if they fail.
There will be bonuses for hard cases, and no special treatment of disabled people or lone parents with children at school. "There are about 3.1 million people not working, I think we can get about 1.4 million back to work," Mr Freud says.
Posted by James Bartholomew • Indexed in Welfare benefits
Comments (2)
TrackBack (0)
Comments
I'm a big fan of your book and I'm so glad I found your blog so please keep on blogging.
I have to say that the previous comment is brilliant. Point 4 is sheer genius:)
Many Thanks
Lilli
Posted by: Lilliput at August 13, 2008 02:09 PM
Warning: file(http://63.247.138.2/~bartholo/randomquotes.dump) [function.file]: failed to open stream: No route to host in /home/bartholo/public_html/archives/2008/02/fewer_than_a_th.php on line 314
Warning: implode() [function.implode]: Bad arguments. in /home/bartholo/public_html/archives/2008/02/fewer_than_a_th.php on line 314


Firstly, it's great to see you blogging again.
I am sceptical about the debate surrounding welfare reform from both main parties. With Labour one has to ask why has it taken 10 yeras of government to realise that the system is rotten to the core?
Furthermore, the Tories statements are too vague. Although in fairness to them they may flesh out the details nearer the next election.
From my experience (personal and professional) I believe that the debate needs to be broadened into action that will tackle, for example
(1) The multiple benefits claimed within a single household (DLA, Carers JSA etc.)
(2) The abuse of Working Tax Credits (really a benefit)in which women falsely claim that they are single - the father may be registered at another family member's address.
(3) DLA/Incapacity benefits paid in respect of people who have made no economic contribution to this country - e.g the mother of the terrorist convicted this week.
(4) The explosion in the number of people claiming for "behaviour problems" - and the people responsible being rewarded with Carers Allowance.
Posted by: jimmy mc at February 20, 2008 10:04 PM