Gordon Brown has gave the thumbs down to the Turner Commission report on pensions on the basis that they were 'unaffordable'. But if Mr Brown become prime minister for just one day, his pension pot will double in size.
Below is a delicious letter by Lord Oakeshott, the Liberal Democrat peer, on this subject. One extra thing to bear in mind as you read it: Gordon Brown as Chancellor of the Exchequer has instituted a new system for other people's pensions whereby they get taxed heavily if their pension pot rises above £1.5 million or so. His own pension pot equivalent - as prime minister - would be over £2 million. The hypocrisy - if he takes it - would be awesome.
29th November 2005
Rt Hon Gordon Brown MP
Chancellor of the Exchequer
HM Treasury
Horse Guards Road
London SW1A 2HQ
Dear Chancellor,
Affordability of Pensions – £2.13 million as PM for a day
You insist before Adair Turner publishes his long-awaited Report tomorrow that our country’s pensions must be affordable. Will you lead by example? Many millions in Britain face working longer, trapped in a vicious spiral of means testing because your Pension Credits undermine incentives to save. But you have to serve only another 4 years in Parliament to complete the 26 years and 8 months needed to be entitled to a full index-linked pension of £36,934 a year. It would cost you £1million to buy a comparable pension to the one you have already accrued as an M.P. from a private sector provider such as Prudential. You also have rights to an extra pension for your service as Chancellor since 1997.
If you took over as Prime Minister tomorrow, you would immediately be entitled to an extra pension of £62,418, fully index-linked for life, even if you only serve a day in the post. That would cost you £2.13 million from the Pru. How can it be right to take that on top of the generous pension you have already earned?
Pensions affordability starts at the top. Mr Blair may have made financial commitments on the basis of his retirement package, but will you give a lead by announcing now that you would not take the extra instant Prime Ministerial pension?
Matthew Oakeshott
Liberal Democrat Pensions Spokesman
House of Lords
Quotation for G Brown – Born 20 Feb 1951 – Elected to Parliament 1983
(Fully index-linked annuity for life with surviving spouse’s annuity at 5/8)
Age Next Birthday : 55 PURCHASE PRICE
M.P’s pension: = 22.4 / 26.7 years x £36,934 p.a. - £1 million
P.M.’s Pension if appointed now = £62,418 p.a. £2.13 million
TOTAL £3.13 million
Posted by James Bartholomew • Indexed in Pensions • Politics
Comments (3)
TrackBack (34)
Comments
That's GordEnron Brown for you.
Posted by: Niconoclast at December 7, 2005 04:33 PM
Wasn't income tax supposed to be a temporary tax?Wasn't it introduced at a very low level so it would meet with minimal opposition?
Posted by: niconoclast at December 7, 2005 04:36 PM
Warning: file(http://63.247.138.2/~bartholo/randomquotes.dump) [function.file]: failed to open stream: No route to host in /home/bartholo/public_html/archives/2005/12/you_wouldnt_be.php on line 331
Warning: implode() [function.implode]: Invalid arguments passed in /home/bartholo/public_html/archives/2005/12/you_wouldnt_be.php on line 331


Of course, the Chancellor and Prime Minister don't actually pay income taxes at all. As I understand it, this is by a convention designed to stop their own financial well being influencing government policy.
Posted by: James Hellyer at December 7, 2005 12:59 PM