The Welfare State We're In, The website of the book by James Bartholomew
November 01, 2005
Tuesday
Mr Osborne thinks he can make state schools the best

From George Osborne's speech at the Conservative Party conference last month:

"...competing in an age when our skills are at a premium...means building the best state education system in the world. A system so good that parents want to opt in - not opt out." (His emphasis.)

"Why shouldn't the best schools in the country be State schools? Open to all, on merit alone, regardless of background and income".

It is astonishing and distressing

that Mr Osborne should be under the illusion - or perhaps pretend to be under the illusion - that an administration of which he would be a part would have some magic reform which would transform British state schools from being a disaster, especially for poor people, into being better than private schools.

For over 50 years, people will far more knowledge of state education have believed that they could make British state schools excellent. They have all been wrong. It is an illusion that there is any such magic reform. It is the fact that these schools are controlled and owned by the state that has made them perform so badly. The teachers are fine people in the main. The building are fine. The problem is the government control.

If Mr Osborne really believes that state control of schools can be made to work superbly, he is deluding himself. The position is, incidentally, essentially a socialist one. If he merely pretends to believe state control of schools can be made to work well, he is a cynic deliberately misleading the public to gain power and position for himself.

After all the evidence of recent years that state education has caused widespread illiteracy and alienation, especially among the poor, the idea that the Conservative Party is about to adopt George Osborne's friend and political ally, David Cameron, is depressing. It would be the Conservative Party saying, "Yes, we know the country has major problems that ought to be address. But we care far more about getting elected than saving our country."

Posted by James Bartholomew • Indexed in Education

Comments (2) TrackBack (4)


Comments

Osborne's comments are along the same lines as those of David Cameron, leadership candidate and shadow Education secretary.

Cameron has been banging on about synthetic phonics and various other changes he would impose on the state education system. What makes him think that he is such an expert that he can impose teaching methods from above and achieve the desired result? Perhaps synthetic phonics is great for 95% of the population but doesn't work for the other 5% - are schools to be banned from trying other methods by government edict?

Politicians should admit that they don't know what educational methods are best (how could they?) and think about how to get out of the supply of education and removing central control so that schools are answerable to parents.

Posted by: HJHJ at November 1, 2005 01:38 PM

Jack Straw said the same thing before New Labour were elected: that they'd make the state schools so good that no-one would want to go private. It was as believable then as it is now.

Posted by: perrow at November 1, 2005 06:04 PM

Add a Comment


Warning: file(http://63.247.138.2/~bartholo/randomquotes.dump) [function.file]: failed to open stream: No route to host in /home/bartholo/public_html/archives/2005/11/mr_osborne_thin.php on line 294

Warning: implode() [function.implode]: Bad arguments. in /home/bartholo/public_html/archives/2005/11/mr_osborne_thin.php on line 294